{"id":447,"date":"2016-12-09T20:50:10","date_gmt":"2016-12-09T20:50:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/?p=447"},"modified":"2016-12-09T20:50:10","modified_gmt":"2016-12-09T20:50:10","slug":"henry-thom-sing-chinese-entrepreneur-and-the-arthur-river-gold-rush-1872","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/2016\/12\/09\/henry-thom-sing-chinese-entrepreneur-and-the-arthur-river-gold-rush-1872\/","title":{"rendered":"Henry Thom Sing, Chinese entrepreneur, and the Arthur River gold rush 1872"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Henry<\/a>

Henry Thom Sing, from the Weekly Courier, 30 May 1912, p.22.<\/p><\/div>\n

A downtown Launceston store is the face of a forgotten immigrant success story. The building at 127 St John Street was commissioned by Ah Sin, aka Henry Thom Sing or Tom Ah Sing, Chinese gold digger, shopkeeper, interpreter and entrepreneur. He was born at Canton, China on 14 March 1844, arriving in Tasmania on the ship Tamar<\/em> in 1868.[1]<\/a> Sing appears to have come from to Tasmania from the Victorian goldfields, and he was quick to seize on this experience when the northern Tasmanian alluvial goldfields of Nine Mile Springs (Lefroy), Back Creek and Brandy Creek (Beaconsfield) opened up. Like Launceston\u2019s Peters, Barnard & Co, who hired Chinese miners through Kong Meng & Co in Melbourne, Sing began to recruit Chinese diggers on the Victorian goldfields.[2]<\/a> His good English skills were an asset in trade and communication, and throughout his time in Launceston his services were drawn upon regularly as an interpreter in court cases involving Chinese speakers as far afield as Wynyard and Beaconsfield.<\/p>\n

Circular Head farmer Skelton Emmett had been washing specks of gold in the Arthur River for years before a minor rush was sparked by two sets of brothers, Robert and David Cooper Kay, and Michael and Patrick Harvey, in April 1872.[3]<\/a> Within three months, 160 miner\u2019s rights had been issued and 70 claims registered.[4]<\/a><\/p>\n

Claims were spread over about 2 km around the confluence of the Arthur and Hellyer Rivers. The European diggers generally preferred to work \u2018beaches\u2019 in the river.[5]<\/a> Two European claims, the Golden Crown and the Golden Eagle, were on the Arthur downstream of the junction. The Golden Eagle party, who included William Jones and John Durant, strung a suspension bridge consisting of a single two-inch rope across the river in order to work both banks and for easy access: effectively it was a \u2018bosun\u2019s chair\u2019 or flying fox. They worked their claim with a sluice box and Californian pump.[6]<\/a> James West and party\u2019s claim known as the Southern Cross was in a small gully on the southern side of the Arthur. The Kays\u2019 claim was \u2018in the gulch of a ravine\u2019 a little further inland from the river. The claim of Frank Long, who later found fame on the Zeehan\u2013Dundas silver field, was further down the same gulch.[7]<\/a> The British Lion claim of W King was at the junction of the Arthur and the Hellyer, the Harvey brothers\u2019 claim on the Arthur above it.[8]<\/a> Waters from Circular Head and a man named House also held claims.[9]<\/a><\/p>\n

Most of the gold obtained in the area by Chinese came from working the sand bars and shallows of the Arthur River. Sing had several roles on the field. Although Seberberg & Co had also engaged Chinese diggers for Tasmania, the 50 or so Chinese at the Arthur appear to have represented only two agents, Sing and Peters, Barnard & Co, both Launceston based.[10]<\/a> Because he had a Launceston business to maintain, Sing\u2019s time at the diggings would have been limited. He appears to have had two claims which were worked by Chinese parties, and he acted as an interpreter for other parties.[11]<\/a> He also bought gold from diggers.[12]<\/a> In November 1872, with the river low enough to permit an attack on its dry bed, both Sing parties engaged in \u2018paddocking\u2019, that is, diverting part of or the entire stream by damming it on their claim. On the upper claim the resulting wash dirt was put through a cradle, but the eight men expected to achieve better results when their sluice boxes were complete. Likewise, Lee Hung was building a sluice box.[13]<\/a> The upper party once took 10 oz of gold in a day.[14]<\/a> Wha Sing\u2019s claim on the Arthur above the confluence included a vegetable garden, which would have provided his party with both food and cash, since stores would have been at a premium on the isolated field.[15]<\/a><\/p>\n

One of the Chinese parties was said to have \u2018turned\u2019 the Arthur River in order to work its bed. While the Arthur is a large river, this is not as difficult an undertaking as it sounds. The idea is to drive a short tunnel or channel through a hairpin bend in the river, diverting its flow. A quick scan of the map makes it obvious where this could have been done. In fact the diversion channel would not have been on the Arthur River, but on the Hellyer, just above its junction with the parent river. This ingenious method of exposing a stream bed was employed on many gold fields and in Tasmania by osmiridium miners on Nineteen Mile Creek and other places.<\/p>\n

The largest nugget obtained by February 1873\u20151 oz 3\u00bd dwts\u2015was found by a Chinese party in the river, but, generally, bigger nuggets were taken in the creeks.[16]<\/a> Frank Long claimed to have got his best gold about 10 km from the Arthur River, and his was \u2018much more nuggety\u2019 than that of James West, who worked closer to the river. The gold appears to have been patchy. All the productive claims were above that of the Kays.[17]<\/a> Working the creeks was harder in summer, but diggers made up for the lack of sluicing water by using chutes to bring the washdirt to the river.[18]<\/a><\/p>\n

The Arthur River gold field was deserted by the end of 1873, and the Chinese soon switched to alluvial tin mining in the north-east. Sing built up his Launceston business. By the time he was naturalised as a British subject in 1882, he was renting a shop and residence at 127 St John Street, Launceston.[19]<\/a> In 1883 he bought the site and erected a new premises designed by Leslie Corrie.[20]<\/a> Here he sold imported Chinese groceries, \u2018fancy goods\u2019, preserved fruits, silk, tobacco, fireworks and the Chinese drinks and remedies Engape, Noo Too and Back Too.[21]<\/a> Sing\u2019s residence also served as a staging-post of Chinese tin miners arriving in Launceston. In 1885 he cemented his position in the north-east by buying out the store of Ma Mon Chin & Co at Weldborough, which afterwards operated as Tom Sing & Co.[22]<\/a><\/p>\n

While a \u00a310 poll tax was levied on Chinese entering the colony in 1887, Launceston\u2019s established Chinese population became part of the community, with local businessmen Chin Kit, James Ah Catt and Henry Thom Sing supporting the work of the Launceston City and Suburbs Improvement Association by staging spectacular Chinese carnivals at City Park in 1890 and the Cataract Gorge in 1891. Fire gutted the Sing premises in 1895, and as a result it was either altered or rebuilt to the design of Launceston architect Alfred Luttrell.[23]<\/a> This building remains today.<\/p>\n

Sing married twice, and fathered at least seven children.[24]<\/a> Both his brides appear to have been European. His death, in May 1912, aged 68, after 44 years in the Launceston business community, passed almost without comment in the Tasmanian press, perhaps indicating that, despite his naturalisation, a racial barrier between Chinese and Europeans remained.[25]<\/a> Probate valued at \u00a31738 suggested modest success.[26]<\/a> Like the former Chung Gon store in Brisbane Street, today Henry Thom Sing\u2019s St John Street store remains part of Launceston\u2019s commercial sector.<\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> Naturalisation application, 22 July 1882, CSD13\/1\/53\/850 (TAHO), https:\/\/linctas.ent.sirsidynix.net.au\/client\/en_AU\/all\/search\/results?qu=tom&qu=sing<\/a>, accessed 10 December 2016.<\/u><\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> \u2018New Chinese diggers\u2019, Tasmanian<\/em>, 11 February 1871, p.11.<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> \u2018Gold discoveries at King\u2019s Island and Rocky Cape\u2019, Cornwall Chronicle,<\/em> 29 April 1872, p.3.<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> Charles Sprent to James Smith from Table Cape, 21 July 1872, NS234\/3\/1\/25 (Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office).<\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> \u2018The Hellyer goldfield\u2019, Cornwall Chronicle,<\/em> 22 November 1872, p.2.<\/p>\n

[6]<\/a> \u2018Notes on the Hellyer\u2019, Cornwall Chronicle,<\/em> 20 December 1872, p.2.<\/p>\n

[7]<\/a> \u2018A look round the Hellyer\u2019, Cornwall Chronicle,<\/em> 3 February 1873, p.2.<\/p>\n

[8]<\/a> \u2018Notes on the Hellyer\u2019, Cornwall Chronicle,<\/em> 20 December 1872, p.2.<\/p>\n

[9]<\/a> \u2018The Hellyer gold-field\u2019, Cornwall Chronicle,<\/em> 16 December 1872, supplement, p.1.<\/p>\n

[10]<\/a> \u2018The Nine Mile Springs goldfield\u2019, Cornwall Chronicle<\/em>, 13 May 1872, p.2; \u2018Chinese immigration\u2019, Tasmanian<\/em>, 18 May 1872, p.8.<\/p>\n

[11]<\/a> See, for example, \u2018More gold from the Hellyer diggings\u2019, Tasmanian<\/em>, 25 January 1873, p.12.<\/p>\n

[12]<\/a> ‘Table Cape’, Tasmanian<\/em>, 25 January 1873, p.5.<\/p>\n

[13]<\/a> \u2018The Chinese diggers at the Hellyer\u2019, Cornwall Chronicle,<\/em> 6 November 1872, p.3.<\/p>\n

[14]<\/a> \u2018The Hellyer goldfield\u2019, Cornwall Chronicl,e<\/em> 22 November 1872, p.2.<\/p>\n

[15]<\/a> \u2018The Chinese diggers at the Hellyer\u2019, Cornwall Chronicle,<\/em> 6 November 1872, p.3.<\/p>\n

[16]<\/a> \u2018The Hellyer diggings\u2019, Mercury, <\/em>13 February 1873, p.3.<\/p>\n

[17]<\/a> \u2018Table Cape\u2019, Cornwall Chronicle,<\/em> 17 January 1873, p.3.<\/p>\n

[18]<\/a> SB Emmett, \u2018The western gold field\u2019, Launceston Examiner,<\/em> 1 February 1873, p.3.<\/p>\n

[19]<\/a> Naturalisation application, 22 July 1882, CSD13\/1\/53\/850 (TAHO), https:\/\/linctas.ent.sirsidynix.net.au\/client\/en_AU\/all\/search\/results?qu=tom&qu=sing<\/a>, accessed 10 December 2016.<\/u><\/p>\n

[20]<\/a> \u2018Tenders\u2019, Launceston Examiner<\/em>, 26 July 1884, p.1..<\/p>\n

[21]<\/a> \u2018Law Courts\u2019, Tasmanian<\/em>, 26 May 1883, p.563.<\/p>\n

[22]<\/a> Advert, Launceston Examiner<\/em>, 19 September 1885, p.1.<\/p>\n

[23]<\/a> \u2018Tenders\u2019, Launceston Examiner<\/em>, 7 March 1895, p.1.<\/p>\n

[24]<\/a> \u2018Deaths\u2019, Launceston Examiner<\/em>, 29 March 1882, p.2; marriage registration no.966\/1884, https:\/\/linctas.ent.sirsidynix.net.au\/client\/en_AU\/all\/search\/results?qu=henry&qu=thom&qu=sing#<\/a>; accessed 10 December 2016.<\/u><\/p>\n

[25]<\/a> \u2018Deaths\u2019, Weekly Courier<\/em>, 30 May 1912, p.25.<\/p>\n

[26]<\/a> Will AD96\/1\/11, LINC Tasmania website, accessed 10 December 2016.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A downtown Launceston store is the face of a forgotten immigrant success story. The building at 127 St John Street was commissioned by Ah Sin, aka Henry Thom Sing or Tom Ah Sing, Chinese gold digger, shopkeeper, interpreter and entrepreneur. He was born at Canton, China on 14 March 1844, arriving in Tasmania on the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[232,230],"tags":[245,58,248,253,249,244,251,24,243,247,252,250,23,246],"class_list":["post-447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-circular-head-history","category-tasmanian-high-country-history","tag-ah-sin","tag-arthur-river","tag-back-creek","tag-barnard-co","tag-brandy-creek-beaconsfield","tag-chinese-miners","tag-frank-long","tag-gold-mining","tag-henry-thom-sing","tag-nine-mile-springs-lefroy","tag-peters","tag-skelton-emmett","tag-tin-mining","tag-tom-sing"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=447"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":449,"href":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions\/449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nichaygarth.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}